|
Seven species of
marine turtle occur worldwide, five of which are found throughout tropical
and subtropical waters while a further two species have more restricted
geographical ranges (Table 1). The IUCN classifies three species as
Critically Endangered, a further three as Endangered and a single species as
Data Deficient. All marine turtle species are therefore of conservation
concern due to declining worldwide populations and increasing anthropogenic
impacts both offshore and at their nesting beaches and adjacent coastal
zones. Identified anthropogenic threats to marine turtles include deliberate hunting for
meat, exploitation of eggs, high levels of accidental capture in fishing
nets, trawls and on long-lines, loss of nesting habitat, loss of foraging
habitat, marine litter, pollution and disease.
Table 1. Status of marine
turtles worldwide (IUCN
= International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources)
|
English name |
Scientific name |
Distribution |
IUCN status |
|
Leatherback turtle |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Worldwide
in tropical/subtropical/temperate waters |
Critically
endangered |
|
Loggerhead
turtle |
Caretta
caretta |
Worldwide
in tropical/subtropical waters |
Endangered |
|
Green
turtle |
Chelonia mydas |
Worldwide
in tropical/subtropical waters |
Endangered |
|
Hawksbill
turtle |
Eretmochelys imbricata |
Worldwide
in tropical/subtropical waters |
Critically
endangered |
|
Flatback
turtle |
Natator
depressus |
Northern
Australia and southern Papua New Guinea |
Data
deficient |
|
Olive
ridley turtle |
Lepidochelys olivacea |
Worldwide
in tropical/subtropical waters |
Endangered |
|
Kemp’s
ridley turtle |
Lepidochelys kempii |
Primarily
Gulf of Mexico (and warm Atlantic Ocean) |
Critically
endangered |
One impact
on marine turtles that has been undocumented to date, is the
accidental entrapment and mortality of turtles within geophysical
seismic survey equipment. Marine turtles are frequently encountered
during seismic surveys conducted in tropical/subtropical waters
(Figure 1), for example off Brazil (de Gurjão et al., 2005), the
Canary Islands (Pierpoint and Fisher, 2003) and Angola (Weir, 2007).
Figure 1. Olive ridley and leatherback turtles
photographed from 3D seismic survey vessels off Angola
In recent years,
the increased presence of Marine Mammal Observer's (MMOs) onboard seismic
survey vessels has raised awareness of marine fauna amongst seismic crews
and oil companies. One conservation issue that has become apparent
over this period is that of turtles becoming caught in seismic tail buoys
and other towed equipment. Marine seismic surveys are usually conducted
using specialised vessels that tow up to 16 seismic cables, each of up to 10
km in length, with a typical separation of 50 to 100 m between the cables.
Maintaining the cable separation and monitoring their position requires a
considerable amount of equipment to be towed astern of seismic ships,
including paravanes (or 'doors'), mono-wings, dilt floats (located at the
head of each cable) and tail buoys (located at the end of each cable) (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Schematic (not
to scale) showing a
simplified configuration
for a 3D marine seismic vessel towing six
cables
The following
pages provide information on the fatal entrapment of turtles within seismic
tail buoys, aiming to raise awareness of this issue and provide some
potential solutions to the problem.
 |